It seems to me that the Occupy Vancouver demonstration has lost sight of its goals (if it ever had a vision) and has alienated the people who should be on their side.
The 99% was about a rethinking of the distribution of wealth, but the draft demands of the Occupy Vancouver group are all over the map and have diluted the message to the point of ridiculousness (I agree with most of the points within their ‘demands’, but projects that attempt to boil the ocean are doomed to fail). They have lost the audience who could have helped with the original problem.
The demands set forth in their draft include Economic Demands (e.g.: “We demand that the banks be nationalized…”), Political Demands (including one connected with conspiracy theory: “We demand an independent investigation into 9/11 which will examine all evidence including that which would support a false-flag explanation.”), Societal Demands (e.g.: “We demand that all botanical drugs be distributed like coffee beans.”), and Environmental Demands (e.g.: “We demand that the nuclear industry be phased out.”).
You cannot demand the world and expect to be taken seriously.
The protesters have also declared that they do not respect the authority of police, firemen, and elected officials, yet the protesters have no problems using lawyers in a court of law.
And, during a meeting regarding the ‘tent city’ of protesters in Vancouver, protesters barged in, yelled and screamed over the voices of anybody who talked (if their opinion differed from the protesters), and complained when question time ran out (mostly due to the protesters waste of time and energy).
The protesters are led by people who enjoy confrontation. There is no benefit to be gained from the actions of anarchy: organization and workable solutions are required.
I hope the original ideology can be regained and a movement evolves with leadership that uses equanimity and maturity to guide passion.