Yellow Blue Tibia is the first novel by Adam Roberts I’ve read and I chose the novel because of Kim Stanley Robinson’s claim, reproduced on the novel’s cover, that it “Should have won the 2009 Booker Prize.” Robinson feels that science fiction novels are marginalized, and he may have a point, but to make a claim that a certain novel should win a prize is rather fatuous: it would have been enough to state that he thinks it should have been considered for a Booker Prize (it wasn’t even long-listed), but to state that it should have won is provocative and invites undue criticism.
Although I began the novel with a certain prejudice, I was won-over by Robert’s writing, but I don’t think the book should have been considered for a major literary prize. The main character, Konstantin Andreiovich Skvorecky, is an enjoyable invention (sarcastic, and teeming with wry wit), and the story is quite engaging, but there wasn’t enough depth to fully immerse me as a reader, and Roberts has an annoying tendency to overdo some sections, as if readers are obtuse.
I enjoyed the novel, but it didn’t strike me as a particularly brilliant work of literature. As I mentioned, Kim Stanley Robinson believes (stated, in an article for the New Scientist) that Yellow Blue Tibia should have won the Booker Prize in 2009 (won by Hilary Mantel, for Wolf Hall). In the article, he complained that the novels that win tend to be ‘historical’ novels, which “…are not about now in the way science fiction is.” I disagree with his statement, but we all have our personal opinions. Robinson lists a few other science fiction novels that he believes should have won the Booker Prize in previous years; again, I think to be taken seriously he should propose the novels as worthy choices for the prize, rather than stating that they should have won. I have only read one of the other books he mentioned (Air, by Geoff Ryman in 2005), and it is a novel that I think should have received more attention as a work of literature, but that is only my opinion, and — not surprisingly — I’ve never been asked to participate on the Booker Prize advisory committee, or as a judge. I don’t always agree with the winning book in prize selections; oftentimes, I think the Booker short-listed novels are superior to the winner; however, it is a subjective opinion, and the Booker Prize is not awarded by an individual.
I’m glad I read Yellow Blue Tibia; for the most part it was well written and I’ll probably try another of Adam Robert’s books. I was ill-disposed toward him ever since I read his review of Grass, by Sheri S. Tepper, in which he refers to her novel as “….an unusually literate piece of SF.” I think Grass is a decent book, but not particularly ‘literate.’ After reading the review I decided to steer clear of Adam Roberts’ novels; well, I have now read one, and I think he is a much better writer than Ms. Tepper, but that is only my opinion.
.
.
.









